[hbsmrusers] Places in HBSMR and GIS [Scanned]

[Chris Wardle]

Nick,

Scott is talking about a UAD.



>>> "Nick Boldrini" <Nick.Boldrini at northyorks.gov.uk> 30/09/2009 10:50 >>>
Hi Scott

this s beginning to sound like you are veering into the realms of an EUS - might that be a more appropriate way to deal with this sort of issue? IE multi period development of a town?

just a thought

best wishes

Nick Boldrini
Historic Environment Record Officer
Countryside Service
Economic and Rural Services
Business and Environmental Services
North Yorkshire County Council
County Hall
Northallerton
DL7 8AH
Direct Dial (01609) 532331

Nick Boldrini covers archaeological development control work for Selby District ONLY.
For all other districts archaeological development control, contact
Lucie Hawkins Direct Dial: 01609 532316 lucie.hawkins at northyorks.gov.uk 

Conserving North Yorkshire's heritage - encouraging sustainable access
www.northyorks.gov.uk/her 



>>> "Chris Wardle" <Chris.Wardle at leicester.gov.uk> 30/09/2009 09:57 >>>
Hi Scott,

It's all a matter of judgement. As someone who maintains a similar unitary authority HER, and from what I know of Nottingham,
-I would do as the NMR have done and have a record for the Saxon burh/Lace Market
-I would also have a separate monument(s) for the Norman castle. 
-A third monument for the mediaeval borough that developed between the Saxon burgh and the castle along Castle Gate.
-A forth monument for the later mediaeval town enclosed by its walls 
-Perhaps with a fifth for the Market Place.
-Is then up to you to decide to add any significant mediaeval suburbs (perhaps near the main bridge across the Trent). 
And so on..

Cheers

Chris


>>> Scott Lomax <Scott.Lomax at nottinghamcity.gov.uk> 30/09/2009 09:20 >>>
Hi all,

Apologies if this has already been responded to. I did send this a month or two ago but all our email accounts were not working and I can't see this message in the archives for the group so I'm assuming it didn't get through.

I'm wondering how people deal with a place on the GIS and in HBSMR. The National Monuments Record have the pre Conquest borough/Mercian burh of Nottingham as a monument in its own right.

I can understand why that is, but then if the pre-Conquest settlement is a monument in its own right, then shouldn't later expansions of Nottingham also be monuments? Where do people draw the line as to which places get classed as monuments when places are constantly growing? If the pre Conquest borough is a monument then should I also record the medieval town as a monument/place? To me, if you have the pre conquest borough then you have to have the medieval town, then the post medieval town and the modern town and you can keep dividing Nottingham's expansion into several different records - Iron Age settlement etc. And if so how does that get mapped in the GIS - just a point, or not bother at all?

I am tempted to just use the Themes module to write a good piece detailing the development of Nottingham over time and have additional map layers to show the extents, rather than have monument records.

Thanks.

Best wishes,
Scott



Scott Lomax
Nottingham Urban Archaeological Database Project Officer

Nottingham City Museums & Galleries
Brewhouse Yard
Castle Boulevard
Nottingham NG7 1FB

e: scott.lomax at nottinghamcity.gov.uk 


Support Nottingham's bid to be a 2018 FIFA World Cup Host City. Just text nott to 62018 or visit www.england2018bid.com 

This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content 
and cleared by NetIQ MailMarshal.

This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may 
contain personal views which are not the views of 
Nottingham City Council unless specifically stated. 
If you have received it in error, please delete it from
your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information
in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
immediately. Please note that Nottingham City Council
monitors e-mails sent or received for the purposes of
ensuring compliance with its policies and procedures.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.
The contents of e-mails sent or received may have to be
disclosed if a relevant request is made under current
legislation, such as, but not limited to, the Data Protection
Act 1998 and the Freedom of Information Act 2000


_______________________________________________
hbsmrusers mailing list
hbsmrusers at britarch.net 
http://www.britarch.net/mailman/listinfo/hbsmrusers 
Access your county council services online 24 hours a day, 7 days a week at www.northyorks.gov.uk.

WARNING

Any opinions or statements expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily those of North Yorkshire County Council.

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this in error, please do not disclose any information to anyone, notify the sender at the above address and then destroy all copies.

North Yorkshire County Councils computer systems and communications may be monitored to ensure effective operation of the system and for other lawful purposes. All GCSX traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in accordance with relevant legislation.

Although we have endeavoured to ensure that this e-mail and any attachments are free from any virus we would advise you to take any necessary steps to ensure that they are actually virus free.

If you receive an automatic response stating that the recipient is away from the office and you wish to request information under either the Freedom of Information Act, the Data Protection Act or the Environmental Information Regulations please forward your request by e-mail to the Data Management Team (datamanagement.officer at northyorks.gov.uk) who will process your request.

North Yorkshire County Council.